Phase 9J / Human Review Foundation

Conflicting fact claim: availability_state

Read-only conflict packet with human review-note capture. Review records are stored as audit evidence only. This page does not resolve conflicts, mutate source data, change truth decisions, alter identity links, or modify source reputation.

HIGH / FACT_CLAIM
Conflict Key 3e1ebd50c9cb0a5f8adf7f6516b78a9beb3333ee
Type fact_claim
Severity high
Animal Entity 1
Conflict Summary

Competing Values

MILLIE found multiple values for the same claim key on one canonical animal.

available adopted
Evidence Rows

Supporting Conflict Evidence

Field Value Confidence / Status
claim_key availability_state confidence=0.9100
claim_value_text available confidence=0.9100
confidence 0.9100 confidence=0.9100
evidence_type demo confidence=0.9100
extraction_method phase9a_demo_seed confidence=0.9100
status active confidence=0.9100
claim_key availability_state confidence=0.6800
claim_value_text adopted confidence=0.6800
confidence 0.6800 confidence=0.6800
evidence_type phase9h_demo confidence=0.6800
extraction_method phase9h_demo_conflict_seed confidence=0.6800
status active confidence=0.6800
Human Review Foundation

Record Review Note

This records review context only. It does not resolve the conflict or modify evidence.

Review History

Recorded Review Notes

No review notes have been recorded for this conflict yet.
Review Guidance

Questions For Human Review

These prompts help reviewers classify whether the conflict is source staleness, mapping error, identity uncertainty, temporal contradiction, or truth-resolution uncertainty.

Are the conflicting fact claims extracted from the same source record or from different sources?
Do the confidence values suggest one claim is much stronger than the other?
Is this a field where time matters, such as availability, medical state, or lifecycle?
Which source or source record produced each competing value?
Which evidence is newest, and which evidence may be stale?
Which source appears more reliable for this field?
Does this conflict suggest a source mapping problem, an identity problem, or a normal lifecycle change?
Should this be routed to future human review, source repair, or identity review?
Same Animal Context

Related Conflicts On This Animal

Competing truth candidates: availability_state / MEDIUM Open Packet