Conflict Summary
Competing Values
Truth resolution has multiple candidate values for this animal and truth key.
available
adopted
Phase 9J / Human Review Foundation
Competing truth candidates: availability_state
Read-only conflict packet with human review-note capture. Review records are stored as audit evidence only. This page does not resolve conflicts, mutate source data, change truth decisions, alter identity links, or modify source reputation.
MEDIUM / TRUTH_CANDIDATE
Conflict Key
bcb79fee0ee0423941af303abcd9195b98717e07
Type
truth_candidate
Severity
medium
Animal Entity
1
Evidence Rows
Supporting Conflict Evidence
| Field | Value | Confidence / Status |
|---|---|---|
| candidate_value | available | confidence=0.9100 |
| confidence_score | 0.9100 | confidence=0.9100 |
| truth_status | candidate | confidence=0.9100 |
| candidate_value | available | confidence=0.9050 |
| confidence_score | 0.9050 | confidence=0.9050 |
| truth_status | selected_candidate | confidence=0.9050 |
| candidate_value | adopted | confidence=0.6800 |
| confidence_score | 0.6800 | confidence=0.6800 |
| truth_status | candidate | confidence=0.6800 |
Human Review Foundation
Record Review Note
This records review context only. It does not resolve the conflict or modify evidence.
Review History
Recorded Review Notes
No review notes have been recorded for this conflict yet.
Review Guidance
Questions For Human Review
These prompts help reviewers classify whether the conflict is source staleness, mapping error, identity uncertainty, temporal contradiction, or truth-resolution uncertainty.
Are the candidate confidence scores close enough that MILLIE should defer a final decision?
Which truth evidence rows support each candidate?
Do source weights explain why one candidate is stronger?
Which source or source record produced each competing value?
Which evidence is newest, and which evidence may be stale?
Which source appears more reliable for this field?
Does this conflict suggest a source mapping problem, an identity problem, or a normal lifecycle change?
Should this be routed to future human review, source repair, or identity review?
Same Animal Context
Related Conflicts On This Animal
Conflicting fact claim: availability_state / HIGH
Open Packet